Ok, the official title of the article was “Only a terror attack can save Obama” but we all know what that means.
Robert Shapiro, former senior advisor to Bill Clinton was quoted in the Financial TImes as saying that only an attack like 9/11 or Oklahoma City bombing could save Obama’s approval ratings and give him a chance to redeem himself as a leader. And we all know those two examples he gave were false flags, so what exactly is he saying?
“Buried in a Financial Times article about Obama’s “growing credibility crisis” and fears on behalf of Democrats that they could lose not only the White House but also the Senate to Republicans, Robert Shapiro makes it clear that Obama is relying on an October surprise in the form of a terror attack to rescue his presidency.
“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”
Prime Minister Harper is now working on passing a new bill, C-42, which would give the US Department of Homeland Security the right to prohibit anyone from boarding a plane in Canada that is not destined to land on US soil, but to fly over US airspace on its way to somewhere else. The Canadian government is working on a bill that will expand the American government’s powers! What does that tell you? They say it is legitimate, that the US has a right to control who passes through its airspace, but if this were so legitimate, the US would be able to just declare it a requirement and wouldn’t need the Canadian government to pass a law to implement it.
Under this new law, a Canadian citizen could be barred from boarding if their name is on the list or even if they just happen to have the same name as someone who is on that list.
Meanwhile, the American “Secure Flight Program” began in June of this year for all domestic US flights, adding names to a no-fly list of purported terrorists or people with ties to terrorism, such as this 6-year-old girl.
Because she is 6, obviously not a terrorist, she was allowed to board after all. But I would bet that if an innocent adult somehow ends up on the list, they are just out of luck.
Up until now, in Canada, no person has been under obligation to talk to or show ID to the police unless they are being arrested for having broken the law. However, the Canadian government has used the excuse of the G20 meeting in Toronto to sneakily pass a law that offers a loophole to those wishing to violate Canadians’ constitutional rights in the name of stepped-up security.
What the clever bastards did was convene a 5-member cabinet meeting to ammend an obscure existing law in order to designate part of Toronto as a Public Work so that police could have authority, under the Public Works Act, to search and demand ID of anyone entering the premises. In accordance with the law, the public was ‘notified’. However, this was not with an announcement on the evening news, but with the law change being published on an obscure government website, ensure rather that the only people to whose attention this would come would be those who regularly peruse this online publication. And indeed, all 5 readers were made aware.
So, to the tourists, I say ‘Welcome to Canada. Make sure to bring your toothbrush and camera, but leave your human dignity at home’.
Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Secret+lets+police+arrest+failing+show+near+summit/3201082/story.html#ixzz0rzQXzRgG
One of the first victims of this act was Charlie Veitch, British citizen, maker of online films and founder of the ‘Love Police’. He was detained, debased, and thoroughly dehumanized for nearly 20 hours for refusing to show his ID while bullhorning in Toronto, singing the Star Wars theme to a gaggle of private security corps members.
WearechangeLA leader Bruno Bruhwiler was arrested on totally bogus charges this week.
He was first sent out of a courtroom for having the wrong facial experssion, then detained and charged with tresspassing. When the ridiculousness of charging someone with tresspassing on public property was considered, the charge was changed to “contempt of court”. But wait! The judge hadn’t held him in contempt so… let’s change that to “causing a public disturbance”.
(officers scratching heads) “Hmmm…There’s gotta be SOMETHING we can charge him with…Ok, let’s just make something up. How about ‘resisting arrest’? He didn’t resist? Let’s just say he did. let’s say he did it, say…Twice. And let’s add that he threatened you. He threatened you, ok?”
– Ok, if you say so. What did he threaten me with?”
– Ok, sounds good.
– Great! Now we can charge him as a terrorist!
– Another job well done.”
The conversation must have gone something like that. Activists are being treated as terrorists everywhere from LA to Montreal. An article in our local paper, the Gazette, described how activists’ friends were being visited by CSI as part of an intimidation tactic, not intented to actually gather information, but to mes with the activists so they would then do something to incriminate themselves.
Meanwhile, a lady who is a nurse and a mother of five children was visited by the FBI who insisted that their visit had nothing to do with her involvement in protests against what Israel is doing to the Palestinians, and that it was her right to protest and that is a wonderful thing, but that they were there to find out if she had any knowledge of things that may result from the protests, such as violent acts or destruction of property. These agents must have aced their NWO double-think classes in Police State School. If you are an activist, you may want to watch this video. She gives some good tips about how to deal with such a visit.
According to a new UN report, world food prices are expected to rise as much as 40% in the next ten years. Hunger and food insecurity have risen as a result of recent price hikes and global economic crisis, resulting in about 1 billion people being undernourished. Biofuels are admitted to be a factor in this.
The production of biofuels has long been known to be contributing to world hunger.
2007 article from The Guardian:
“The western appetite for biofuels is causing starvation in the poor world. Developing nations are being pushed to grow crops for ethanol, rather than food – all thanks to political expediency”
2008 article from the Times Online (UK)
“Rush for biofuels threatens starvation on a global scale”
Uk government Chief Scientific Adviser Professor John Beddington states publicly that biofuels are likely to cause food shortages that rival climate change in terms of the threat they would pose to humanity.
House of Commons Science and Technology
“The Regulation of Geoengineering”
Report printed March 10, 2010
Page 11: ‘carbon dioxide removal’
Page 13: ‘solar radiation management’
“Cloud Albedo: It has been proposed that the Earth could be cooled by whitening clouds over parts of the ocean.42
Aerosol injection: Large volcano eruptions result in the mass injection of sulphate particles— formed from the emitted sulphur dioxide—into the stratosphere. As these aerosols reflect solar radiation back to space, or themselves absorb heat, mass eruptions result in a cooling of the lower atmosphere. The eruption of Mount Tambora in present day Indonesia, for example, was thought to have produced the “year without a summer” in 1816. In the 1970s, Professor Budyko proposed that “artificial volcanoes” be geoengineered. That is, that sulphate aerosols be injected into the
stratosphere to mimic the cooling effect caused by these “super-eruptions”.43”
Page 15: ‘weather modification techniques’
Below is a video about a government document about geoengineering which basically admits everything many of us have been long suspecting about chemtrails.
“Atmospheric Aerosol Properties and Climate Impacts”