Tag Archives: murder

KIM DOTCOM DROPS BOMBSHELL IN SETH RICH CASE!

murdered for leaks buttoonNew information coming out is re-opening questions about Seth Rich’s murder and whether a hit was put out on him for leaking DNC emails.

The mainstream media has called this story a ‘conspiracy theory’, and has  endeavoured to discredit private investigator Ron Wheeler, but new tweets from Kim Dotcom appear to confirm that Seth Rich was the insider who leaked the embarrassing DNC emails. This again raises the possibility that his murder may have not been a random robbery gone awry.

See video below for the full story.

Snuff Films and Pedophiles in High Places in Arizona

The following was written by someone who wishes to remain anonymous:

I used to work in civil service for a small government research department in Phoenix, AZ

Most of the research we did was mundane and really dull. One thing we did were studies of other departments including the sheriff’s department headed by the famous Joe Arpaio, the ‘toughest sheriff in America’.

On more than one occasion when interviewing Sheriff’s Department employees allegations of misconduct would come up usually regarding drug and under age prostitution rings. In 2006, while conducting an exit (after employment) interview with a former Sheriff’s Department, similar allegation came up but with an added twist. The interview was basically normal, covering aspects of the job, benefits, compensations etc. At the end I asked interviewees if they had anything they would like to add. In this instance the respondent seemed like he had something he wanted to add but was reluctant. I assured him I would respect his confidentiality and was actually under an oath to do so and if I did violate his confidentiality he could file charges on me. He began to tell me there were ‘bad things, criminal things’ going on at the Sheriff’s Department but was reluctant to go further. I let him know I had heard things like that in the past and even prompted him by say ‘ you’re talking about the drug rings and the prostitution rings’. He then said ‘yes but that’s not all of it. They make movies in these old warehouses out in Scottsdale.’ After my somewhat blasé but friendly response he went on to say these movies were using ‘little kids’ by which he did not mean teenagers. He also mentioned a specific, highly placed person in the Sheriff’s Department.

A few months later I was visiting with an old friend and one of his buddies. During the course of the conversation I mentioned an incident where the Sheriff’s Department had given me a copy of the blueprints to the new jail to use as a map because they were tired of providing me with an armed escort when I had to go down there. I thought this was really stupid of them and joked about selling it on EBay. My friend’s buddy then began asking me what I knew about the Sheriffs Department and ‘things I heard’. When I asked for specifics he replied ‘criminal activities’ I told him about the drug and teenage prostitute rings, which were basic common knowledge on the street. He asked me if I heard anything about anything in Scottsdale and I said that I did, something about movies being shot in warehouses out there. He then said ‘did I know what kind of movies’ and I said ‘what I heard was kiddie porn but you hear all kinds of things’ and he said, really loudly ‘ it’s not just kiddie porn, it’s kiddie snuff porn. This was a bit much for me and I looked over at my friend as to say is he for real and all my friend said was ‘it’s true’. Then as he was going on about it he said ‘ do you know who’s behind it ?’ And before I could say anything, he blurted out the same name the ex-employee had.

The last reference to the kiddie porn movies came while visiting a friend of one of my neighbors. We had gone over there to ‘party’. When the neighbor’s friend found out where I worked he was at first suspicious since contraband herbal party supplies were in evidence then after awhile became more comfortable. He asked me what I knew about the Sheriff’s Department and also, the witness protection program and could I get a hold of someone for him.

Upon me asking ‘why?’ he wanted to know stuff, he then went into a long tale about how his cousin was a LEO, was involved in a case that involved law enforcement and Federal judges, and then provided some very gruesome details about special movies being made, that involved very small children and infants, grownups, strange costumes, and snuff (killing). His cousin supposedly had entered witness protection, no one ever went to trial, and he hadn’t heard from her since. He wanted to know if I could a message to his cousin. The movies, he mentioned at one point, were filmed in some old warehouses and also mentioned the name of the Sheriff’s Department employee. The details he gave me, supposedly coming from his cousin to whom he was very close, were horrific.
He had also mentioned that his cousin had been very badly affected by this and had been persuaded to stay on the case because of her ‘in’. Supposedly also this was something she stumbled on while doing undercover work investigating cocaine smuggling.

Unfortunately I was not in a position to help him. Same story from three different sources that I seriously doubt knew each other.

One of the deputies whose name came up in connection with the things described above was David Hendershott who, when he retired at full pension, was rehired the next day in a new position, at over 150 thousand dollars a year in addition to his pension. His son, by the same name is also a Sheriff’s Department employee. Hendershott was found to have been hiring friends to ‘work’ for the Sheriff’s department, without having them do much actual work.
www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/05/10/20110510david-hendershott-friend-hired.html

Hendershott was fired in 2011 “based on the findings of a six-month probe, conducted by Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu, into allegations including mismanagement, nepotism and obstruction of a criminal investigation. Babeu’s investigation was triggered by a 63-page internal memo detailing a long list of questionable behavior among top Sheriff’s Office employees.’

www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2011/04/22/20110422arpaio-fires-chief-deputy-herndershot-aides-maricopa-county.html
Despite his public fall from grace during this scandal, Hendershott now works as a private investigator, offering “products and services” which include, among other things, “child abduction recovery”.
blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2012/01/joe_arpaios_david_hendershot_w.php

Hendershott lost his job and was vilified in the press for engaging in various forms of corruption, but he was never questioned regarding his knowledge of the abuse of adults and children, and their use in snuff films. These are the crimes that go univestigated and unpunished because exposing them would expose the rotten core of the justice system itself.

Conspiracy of Killing Seniors for Profit?

Today on The Truther Girls, I will be talking to ivestigative reporter Janet Phelan about the murder of people who have been put under conservatorship. See Janet’s website at janetphelan.com

We will be discussing the issue in general, but we will focus on the coroner coverup of a suspicious death of a conservatee, Raymond Horspool, who died at age 90 in in Riverside County, California.
His son, J. David Horspool, is a powerful probate attorney in So Cal and put his own father under conservatorship- apparently to loot his own family’s estate. Janet got the coroner report and it is full of discrepancies. She has also have interviewed folks at the Sheriff/Coroner and also at Adult Protective services and it seems that there is a very serious problem going on with the report which reeks of a cover up.

Tthe salient issues about the coroner report:
1) there is no weight listed. coroners reports always list the weight and this one carefully avoided it. The family tells Janet that the six foot man weighed 136 when he showed up at the coroner’s office. However, the coroner’s report says the body appeared “well nourished”–hardly describing a 136 lb corpse. When Janet asked the deputy sheriff if it was protocol for the coroner report to list weight, he REFUSED to answer the question.
2) The report lists Horspool as taking morphine and ativan. These two medications are generally contraindicated and there is no reason given why Horspool would have been on morphine, as he had no cancer or other pain-causing illness.

Given the fact that he was on these two medicines which could cause death if mixed, it was incumbent on that office to do a toxicology exam and the office refused to do so. Looks bad….looks real bad.

When a person, often a senior, is put under conservatorship, they are known as a probate and lose all their rights. The person who is appointed as their conservator, or guardian, becomes responsible for making all decisions in their stead, and also administers their estate. Often, this person takes advantage of the situation by appropriating all of the conservatee’s funds and sticking them into a nursing home, where they often die quickly and suddenly under suspicious circumstances. What’s worse is that the courts seems to be involved in this conspiracy to get old people out of the way so that others can benefit from their estate.

Moreover, anyone can be put under conservatorship- not only a senior citizen of advanced age, but anyone who someone has brought to the attention of the courts for being ‘not of sound mind’. This has opened the door to people using this process on others for revenge, such as in divorce proceedings or simply because they have it in for them. The person proposed as incompetent is then evaluated by a court-appointed psychiatrist- who almost invariably finds them to be indeed incompetent. That a person is evaluated by independant psychiatrists who find them to be competent has no effect: the courts rely on the court-appointed psychiatrist. Do you smell conspiracy here? I sure do.

Please also see Janet’s article ‘Why I Am An Abolitionist’ on why she thinks the only solution is abolishing guardianship, not reforming the process. http://www.ucimc.org/content/why-i-am-abolitionist

Listen live at 2:00 pm EST, November 3 at americanfreedomradio.com
Download the archive at americanfreedomradio.com/TrutherGirls_11
Chat room is truthergirls.chatango.com
caller line is 402-237-2525

NB The thumbnail is not Mr Horspool.

Caylee Anthony: The Nanny Did Take Her!

Today when I opened my email, I found the following article saying that Casey Anthony’s father is now saying that he believes Caylee died from an accidental overdose, possibly of Xanax.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/casey-anthony-dad-says-caylee-died-drug-overdose-001212041.html

This comes as no surprise to me, as this is what I have been saying on the radio for the last two weeks. When Casey and her mother initially reported Caylee’s disappearance to police, they said that she was with ‘Zanny the Nanny’- that the nanny took her. They afterwards said that ‘Zanny the Nanny’ was Zenaida Gonzales, a woman who had nothing to do with any of this but had once applied for an apartment in Casey’s building. I later discovered that ‘Zanny the Nanny’ is a slang term for using Xanax to drug your kid. So, if this is what happened, then what Cindy and Casey said was quite litrally true, the ‘nanny’ did take her.

In addition, an inmate who was in jail with Casey stated in an interview that Casey had told her she was in the habit of sedating Caylee with chloroform so that she could go out an party while her little one was knocked out.

This would explain a lot. It could account for why the duct tape was not used to suffocate the child, but to hold her jaw in place, and for why Casey had been googling chloroform and why traces of it were found in her car. It would even explain why she went out to party and get a tattoo saying ‘La Bella Vida’ after Caylee’s death- finally she was free to party, and maybe she thought she would get away with what she had done.

What this also confirms to me is that Cindy was involved with the coverup, as she was the one who stated to police that Caylee was with ‘Zanny’. I’m sure she knew there was no Zanny. I suspect that Casey told her early on what had happened, because when Casey said to her mother, “give me one more day”. Cindy answered ” I’ve given you a month”, which implies that she had known for the whole month.

I think Caylee did die form a drug overdose, and that Casey turned to her mother for help covering it up. Cindy has always stricken me as the ‘brains of the operation’. But why would Casey drug her child in the first place, why would Cindy help her cover it up, why did Casey display such bizarre behaviour, apparently switching from one personality to another, and why did the police not find her responsible in at least the burial of her daughter? There is more to this story, possibly involving some kind of ritual abuse, but for now I am satisfied with the explanation that Caylee died of an overdose.

As Casey said all along, Zanny the Nanny took her.

Casey Anthony: Was It Satanic Ritual Abuse?

I can’t quite figure it out and that’s no surprise since the prosecution couldn’t either. Everything I may say about Casey and what might have really happened is speculation, but I speculate that her parents were very much involved- right from the start.
Some basic facts to the story include:
– Casey tried to give Caylee up at birth but her mother, Cindy, wouldn’t let her. Normally, if a woman wants to adopt her child out, that is up to her. This tells me that Cindy had a lot of control over her daughter.
– On the original 9-1-1 call, Cindy calls to report that Casey has stolen her car and needs to be arrested. Then, when teh call is transfered, one can hear Cindy saying to Casey that she will next bring up the ‘child thing’. Casey asks for ‘one more day’ but Cindy tells her ‘I’ve given you a month’. This sounds to me like it indicates that Cindy has known all along that the child has been missing. Also, the fact that Cindy first calmly reports an auto theft, then brings up the dead body smell in her daughter’s car, and finally discloses the fact that the child is missing and breaks into hysterics on cue, tells me that this was planned, staged and theatric. Again, it leads me to suspect that Cindy was heavily involved and was the one to decide how and when they would bring this to the authorities. If your granddaughter was missing, would you first bring up other issues before reporting this on a call? And why would you break into tears only at the end of the call? If this was the first Cindy had heard of it, I would imagine she would have called in tears and immediately reported the most important part first: Caylee’s disappearance.
– During the 9-1-1 call, Cindy also states to Casey that Caylee is ‘with Zanny’, the nanny, although it later turned out that there was no zanny the Nanny. The name Zenaida Gonzales had been chosen by Casey, or more likely Cindy, for some unknown reason, and the only woman in the area with that name is now suing Casey for defamation of character. I can’t help but notice that ‘Zanny the Nanny’ is very catchy, the kind of thing one woudl remember easily. The kind of name a suspect would have in a movie. Was it Cindy who came up with this? Cindy clearly knew there was no ‘Zanny’, yet she mentioned this fabrication to Casey while waiting for their call to be transferred, as if going over their invented story to make sure Casey had it straight. Why do I think Cindy knew there was no ‘Zanny’? Because she spoke about her as if she knew this woman, calling her by her nickname and not ‘her (Caylee’s) nanny’. If Zanny didn’t exist and Cindy talked about her like she knew her, my guess is it would be because she was involved in creating the lie about her. The alternative would have been that Casey had been lying to her mother for months about a fictitious nanny. What purpose would this serve? The only purpose Zanny served was to divert the cops’ attention, so I think she was made up during the month Caylee was missing.
– During the month that Caylee was missing, Casey partied, went shopping and got a tattoo that said ‘Bella Vita’ : beautiful life. This is bizarre behavious for someone whose kid is missing or has just died.
– During the recorded conversations between Cindy and Casey while Casey was in prison, it’s obvious that Cindy is the one in control. One can clearly see Casey’s frustration at barely being able to get a word in edgewise. Cindy looks to me like the brains of the operation.
– A couple of years into the trial, Casey suddenly states that her daughter died as the result of a drowning accident. Obviously, this is very bizarre.
– The coroner had found duct tape on the child’s skull. She concluded that Caylee was the victim of a homicide and that drowning was unlikely.
– Traces of choloform were found in Casey’s car along with undetermined DNA that was either human or animal- they couldn’t tell for sure.
– A search for ‘how to make chloroform’ was found on Casey’s computer. Cindy said she was responsible for it, but that it happened accidentally with autocomplete while she was looking up chorophyll. It turned out that Cindy was at work while this Google search was done, so she had to be lying about it. Why did she lie?
– Right near the end of the trial, Casey’s lawyer stated that Casey had been sexually abused by her father from the time she was eight and that this is why she was in the habit of lying about everything.
– While in prison, Casey did not act like someone who had just lost her child. She came across very self-centered, saying that this whole affair was ‘ruining her life’, and refered to Caylee as ‘that little girl’. Later, in prison, she had a change of behaviour and started acting like she didn’t have a care in the world.

My speculations are that not only were the grandparents heavily involved in whatever happened, but this might have involved ritual abuse. Possibly Casey had been ritually abused from the time she was a child. The accusations of molestation woudl fit in with that and it woudl explain casey’s bizarre behaviour, as people who undergo this kind of trauma often become very dissociated, sometimes to the point of splitting into two personalities. This could explain her sudden change in demeanor while in prison and her apparent lack of emotions with regards to the death of her child. I would even consider the possibility that Casey tried to give Caylee up to spare her whatever she had gone through herself. As for motive, when it comes to Casey the only motive I could imagine would be wanting to spare her daughter from the same abuse she had endured. This would explain why everyone she knew attested that she was a good mother. maybe she was. Either that or she saw the child as a burden, but the testimonies don’t point to this.
It is also possible that Casey actually had nothing to do with the murder, but that her own parents were directly or indirectly responsible for it.

Cindy comes across as a very strong figure, a mastermind, the one in control. I would suspect that she was the one who all along planned how they would turn Casey, who was not responsible, in. They would do this once the body was decomposed and would conspire in elaborate lies that would lead the police on more than one wild goose chase. Did Cindy or her husband kill Caylee as a ritual sacrifice, or did they allow someone else to sacrifice her? What did they stand to gain from it? I cannot make any accusations, I can only wonder.

But I do wonder, because this case reminds me so much of the JonBenet Ramsey case, in which mountains of circumstantial evidence pointed to the parents, yet they were exonerated. As it turned out, they were involved in a Satanic coven that included judges as well as others in high places. JonBenet had started to speak to teachers about people in robes abusing her, and she had been taken to the doctor 60 times in one year for repeated yeast infections. Her vagina was twice the size of a normal 6-year-olds.

Sexual abuse in both families, plenty of circumstantial evidence, obvious lies involving the entire family, and a verdict of ‘not guilty’ based on insufficient evidence: it is clear both cases have that much in common. But do they also have something even more sinister in common including involvement in Satanic ritual abuse? I can only speculate.