Tag Archives: terrorism

Times Square Terrorist- Another Strange Story

Times Square Bomber

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7114495.ece

A truck with ‘bomb’ materials in it was found in a smoking truck in times Square on Saturday, May 1st. The truck was subsequently towed to a forensics lab. Napolitano states it was an amateurish attempt and that there are ‘a lot of cameras in the area’, perhaps impying that this surveillance equipment will help lead to the apprehension of the culprit- although as we find out later, it doesn’t.

“Duane Jackson, a 58-year-old handbag vendor, said that he noticed the car at around 6.30pm and wondered who had left it there.
“That was my first thought: ‘Who sat this car here?’,” Mr Jackson said, adding that he looked in the car and saw keys in the ignition with 19 or 20 keys on a ring.”
Now, why would someone leave a key ring with 20 keys on it in the ignition of a truck he is attempting to blow up in Times Square with some firecrackers, gasoline, a bag of fertilizer and a Mickey Mouse alarm clock?

One thing false flags all have in common is the trail of oddly glaring evidence left behind at the scene by the purported perps: usually passports or other photo IDs, manifestos betraying suspects’ political agenda, Holy books revealing their religious persuasions, etc. All so convenient for the DHS.

In recent years, with the availability of an abundanc of information on the Internet, a larger and larger portion of the public has come to scrutinize ‘terrorist’ events, checking and cross checking facts and evidence from media reports and other sources, and finding that official versions don’t add up and are full of oddities. Perhaps, knowing that we wouldn’t buy the ‘Oh look, they left behind their driver’s license” line, whoever was behind this false flag thought a ring of keys leading to the scapegoat’s house would be better choice of planted ‘evidence’.

As we shall see, the keys did come in handy.
A woman who was evacuated from a nearby hotel stated that she and other evacuees left the building calmly.
“Nobody seems angry or upset about it. After 9/11 people have learned to listen up and to do what they are supposed to do,” she said.
Ah yes, in this 9/11 world people have learned to shut up and go with the program. How true. Well, for the most part. And every article that covers an incident where public safety is threatened must make the obligatory reference to 9/11 just to remind us to stay afraid.

“Time Square Bomb: The Growing Threat of Improvised Explosives”

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/05/03/times-square-bomb-the-growing-threat-of-improvised-explosives/

Growing threat? Are we supposed to believe that making half-assed bombs out of gasoline and firecrackers is the new craze with the terrorist crowd? I guess we are. According to this article, New york and everywhere else in North America may as well be right up there on the list alongside Kandahar and Baghdad as a place where improvised explosive devices may be sitting around in the ice cream truck parked on the corner.
According to ‘experts’, expertise in making IED is ‘spreading like wildfire across the globe with technical data and training widely shared among terrorist groups’ and these groups are learning new bomb-making skills faster and faster. Obviously, the source and means of spreading this information could only be attributed to one thing: the Internet. The article doesn’t say as much, but the MSM has already told us all too often where terrorists share information and why changes need to be made to the Internet for the sake of our security.

By Tuesday, May 4th, a Pakistani suspect had been apprehended at Kennedy Airport.

http://www.buffalonews.com/2010/05/04/1039523/suspect-held-in-n-y-city-bomb.html

“Law enforcement officials say the suspect recently returned from a trip to Pakistan and bought the 1993 Nissan Pathfinder used in the failed car bomb three weeks ago and paid cash.”
Having visited Pakistan is a recurring theme. Scapegoats are always said to have visited Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc, which shows they may have ties to international terrorism. Of course, it is always possible that these people just went to these countries because that’s where their family lives. But in any case, it turns out convenient again for the DHS. Other evidence of this man having ‘international ties’ to terrorism included phone records that showed he called Pakistan and the presence of things in his car such as a piece of paper. Maybe this paper was from Pakistan. Maybe it was a gum wrapper with Arabic writing on it. That would be a dead giveaway. Figures he would be from Pakistan. The government has an election coming up soon and it would be good to get the public more on board with the US military presence in that area.

On motive, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs stated: “ I would say that was intended to terrorize, and I would say that whoever did that would be categorized as a terrorist,”. Logical enough, but the question is who does this apply to, exactly?

As for the surveillance camera, they were at this point revealed to have shown a 40-ish white man changing his shirt in a nearby alley, which had of course made him a suspect because everybody knows that terrorists are obsessive about frequent wardrobe changes, but that it turned out later that he was probably just doing so because he was hot. Looks like the Keystone Cops are teaming up with the DHS
Ever notice how surveillance cameras catch a lot of strange things on tape but never do much to prevent crime or help, save lives? Case in point: the recent stabbing of a homeless man in New York who had come to the assistance of a woman who was being robbed. It was all caught on tape, including the many pedestrians who walked by his body over the course of the next few hours, one of them taking the time to snap a picture with his camera but not to call 911.

Bomber Confesses

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100504/ap_on_re_us/us_times_square_car_bomb

By Tuesday evening, the AP reported that the suspect, now named as Faisal Shahzad, had ‘admitted’ to being the terrorist in question, having trained at a camp in Pakistan before making the truck bomb that was found in Times Square.

Shahzad apparently had an MBA and a house in the suburbs, which had recently been foreclosed on and this misfortune may have been his motive for attempting to set off a truck bomb in the middle of Manhattan.

According to the article, other evidence of Mr Shahzad’s terrorist leanings included a report from a real-estate broker he had worked with in 2004 that Shahzad
“had expressed a dislike for former President George W. Bush and his policy in Iraq”. Well, there you go.

Shahzad was apprehended and removed from “a Dubai-bound plane at Kennedy Airport that he had been able to board Monday night despite being placed on the federal “no-fly” list.”

This is the part I don’t understand. Shahzad had no criminal history or known involvement with terrorism or terrorist groups. He came from a wealthy family and was well-educated. The only things he had going against him before this incident were:
– being from Pakistan
– losing his home
– expressing dislike for the government and their foreign policy.
Was that enough to get him on a no-fly list? Or was he placed on that list for no reason other than that he was going to be a designated scapegoat for the NY truck bombing attempt of 2010? Abdul Mutallab, the so-called ‘Undie Bomber’ was also on a no-fly list yet was also allowed to board a plane, although in his case he was actually allowed to fly, not just board. Or could it be that this was done deliberately for the extra added dramatic flair of removing him from a plane which he had already boarded, instead of quietly taking him aside at airport security? Just a thought.

Let’s get back to that key chain
“Keys found in the SUV’s ignition fit the car Shahzad left at the airport and a home in Connecticut.”
Just as I expected. How convenient.

Another strange thing was that he quit his job with a marketing company in May 2009. Then, around the beginning of September, he went to Pakistan, returning on February 3, 2010. Why would you quit your job if you were having trouble making mortgage payments as it was? And why would you then go on a 5-month trip instead of finding another job to look after your mortgage and family. No wonder he lost his house.

And finally, despite all the talk of terrorism in the early reports, Shahzad was read his Miranda rights and charged not with terrorism, but with:
“trying to detonate a weapon of mass destruction, attempted car bombing and obstructing interstate and foreign commerce by trying to kill and maim U.S. citizens”
this is another thing Shahzad has in common with the Undie Bomber. Although both were described as ‘terrorists’ in the MSM, neither were treated as terrorists or charged with terrorism. They were both charged with criminal offenses. When Abdul Mutallan was read his rights after the Christmas 2009 incident, there was some outcry over why he had not been treated as a terrorist, and some apology over this ‘mistake’. But now we have two such cases where an unlikely culprit (Shahzad was described by neighbors as quiet but apparently normal and had no criminal history) engages in an act deemed as a terrorist attack, which results in a failed bombing involving makeshift explosives, and ends with the suspect being read his rights and charged with criminal offenses but not terrorism. And of course, let us not forget about the trail of keys Shahzad left behind.

Since his arrest, Ms Shahzad has been ‘cooperating’ very nicely with the authorities (aka singing like a bird). These guys always do spill the beans as soon as they get busted. The Taliban or whoever was supposedly behind this could learn a thing or two from the mafia or even the Hell’s Angels when it comes to hiring guys who don’t know how to keep their mouths shut. Apparently, the Taliban put out a video on Youtube claiming responsibility, but the DHS has determined there is no evidence for this being true. Why would the Taliban put out such a video and how would the DHS know it wasn’t true. Or maybe this is all part of the False Flag plan to get the public to associate the even with terrorism.

And there’s more! The guy who bought Shahzad’s Connecticut home, I guess the Connecticut home to which the key was left on the keychain in the car, said he was visited by the JTTF just after he bought it! So the JTTF WAS on to Shahzad- or he was some kind of an agent.

My verdict: another Manchurian candidate. Just kidding. But he could have been a hired patsy or agent. I wouldn’t rule that one out.

The FBI makes me giggle

Last week, the FBI released a statement about domestic terrorism referring to the “sovereign citizen” extremist movement as a threat to security. I will entertain the fact that they are only a threat to those who want to impose their corporate rule. I just have a questions regarding their statement found below:

http://www.fbi.gov/page2/april10/sovereigncitizens_041310.html

Sovereign citizens are not anti-government. The government either works for them to uphold personal contracts or they are indifferent to the government because those that are creditors, who conduct their business in the jurisdiction A the private or the republic, do not care for what goes on the jurisdiction B, the public, also known as the democracy because it is a fictitious place where everything is free – it doesn’t exist. In fact, those who are sovereign creditors are not anti-tax, these people have friendly relations with the IRS or the CRA because these organizations work for them. Creditors receive tax money to benefit everyone. Are the FBI referring to those supposed sovereigns who behave as debtors? They need to make a better distinction.

“They are separate or “sovereign”from the United States” Perhaps they think this because they realize that the United States is a corporation with a de facto government originally bought by England after the revolutionary war?

“For example, many sovereign citizens don’t pay their taxes.” Sure, because those that are sovereign creditors receive tax dollars because they manage their not-for-profit corporations.

“They use fake money orders, personal checks, and the like at government agencies, banks and business” Not necessarily, creditors know the power of the pen and how to use real negotiable instruments like accepting and returning for value. They may use their private assets to chip away at the national debt and balance books. Also, what is money? Is it not a promise to pay? Your signature is worth far
more than any bill in circulation because your body is owned by the state and in exchange you were given to ability to write off debt.

“Commit murder and physical assault?” Don’t non-sovereign citizens commit murder and physical assault? In fact, are there not many more people out there who are not sovereign so to propose that sovereigns are more likely to commit murder and physical assault is hogwash? Where is there proof? This is a big statement on the FBI’s part, sovereign creditors are about giving to the world, not destroying it. Is this antithetical to being a sovereign?

“Threaten judges, law enforcement professions, and government personnel” Perhaps if the sovereign is acting like a debtor – but debtors aren’t sovereigns. The sovereign creditor always bringing solutions. They have unlimited commercial potential so they always bring remedy. Creditors remain in honor by conditionally accepting offers which extinguishes conflict.

“Impersonate police officers?” No, they will behave as peace officers to uphold the peace as it is our duty to do so.
“Impersonate diplomats?” Perhaps its difficult for the people to distinguish sovereigns from diplomats…is it a problem?

“White-collar scams, including mortgage fraud and so-called “redemption” schemes…what about banking and mortgages? Is there full disclosure? Creditors
seek to know the maritime-admiralty law and apply it with due diligence in order to make everyone including the banks happy…why? Because they always pay.

Can the FBI come up with something better? Unless they are just scared of debtors I still do not understand why the FBI refers to this as the Sovereign CITIZENS movement. Black’s law (9th ed.) defines sovereign as “1. a person, body or state vested with independent and supreme authority”. Are they afraid of people becoming their own independent and supreme authority?

Perhaps…but how is a citizen defined? “A person who, by either birth or naturalization, is a member of a political community, owing allegiance to the community and being entitled to enjoy all its civil rights and protections; a member of the civil state, entitled to all its privileges”. Are sovereigns citizens? Maybe they exist in the public but their power is discovered in the private world. If men and women were to discover jurisdiction A they too will realize their potential to transform jurisdiction B very quickly into the world they’ve been dreaming of. Who are we? What are we citizens of? Are we a global community or not? Is the idea of scarcity hold us back? Are we citizens because we have been berthed? In exchange for title to our body did they not give us an instrument to discharge debt?

I can’t imagine how the FBI is after sovereign creditors because they are responsible and are paying back the national debt. They are the ones who are working to prevent foreign creditors from coming to our land to collect the debts which appear to be our bodies.

Why You Want to Stay Out of Jail

Obviously you want to stay out of jail, not only because crima is a no-no and as a prisoner you will be instantly turned into a non-person and used for slave labor, but because of the following:

Nearly half the States have adopted complete smoking bans in prisons, and the other half has partial bans in place. By my logic, if they can’t ban heroin from prisons, tey are wasting their time trying to ban tobacco. Likely, it iwll only result in making cigarettes a more valuable contraband, unless…

They scan everyone who comes in and out of the prison with naked scanners! Someone has beaten me to this idea, because two lawsuits are currently in process in Illinois against correctional officers for forcing inmantes and visitors to undergo naked scans. Illinois correctional facilities had been ‘experimenting’ with backscatter scanners, using them not only during prison visits, but during random checks on inmates where they would force a prisoner to submit to a scan or face punishment for refusing to obey a direct order. So if getting repeatedly irradiated is not your thing, you might want to stay out of the can. I know the NWO makes ‘criminals of us all’, but do your best, because it doesn’t stop there.

In the UK, they are now working on microchiping inmates. Supposedly, this will decrease the prison population. As it is, many British inmates are released early and given an rfid ankle bracelet, but the Ministry of Justice is looking into chipping all inmates as well as those who are on probation. The same is being considered in Scottland.

Besides the obvious violation of human rights, this may not be something you would want to undergo because…

Implantable microchips have been found to cause cancer in lab rats!
The following is from the Washington Post:
“A series of veterinary and toxicology studies, dating to the mid-1990s, stated that chip implants had “induced” malignant tumors in some lab mice and rats.

“The transponders were the cause of the tumors,” said Keith Johnson, a retired toxicologic pathologist, explaining in a phone interview the findings of a 1996 study he led at the Dow Chemical Co. in Midland, Mich.”

Of course, they reassure us with the same old ‘humans aren’t rats’ garbage that they used when they shove flu shots down our throats, but besides being the Mark of the Beast, causing cancer in animals is not evidence of safety in humans, even if humans aren’t rats. Except in NWO scientific logic.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-03-24-prison-smoking-ban_N.htm?obref=obinsite

http://www.sfbayview.com/2010/prisoners-forced-to-submit-to-radiation-experiments-for-private-foreign-companies

http://www.naturalnews.com/023481_microchipping_civil_rights_RFID.html

http://www.deeptruths.com/readers-reactions/microchip_implanting_in_scotland.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/08/AR2007090800997_pf.html

Moscow Bombings-Advance Knowledge

On March 29, 2010, two suicide bombers struck in the Moscow Metro (subway), killing 39 people.

According to an article in the Guardian, authorities had been warned in advance that there would likely be an attack on the Moscow subway. Three telegrams had been distributed among law enfocement, but no action was taken. A woman who was detained for reasons unrelate dto the incident overhead a senior officer say “How could you let them through when we had the information?”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/30/russia-terrorism

On March 31, a second suicide attack occurred in Dagestan, involving a car bomb and a suicide bomber dressed as a policeman, killing a total of 12 people and injuring 28 more. The bombings have been attributed to ‘The Black Widows’, a group of wives, daughters and sisters of Chechnyans killed by Russians during Chechnya’s war of secession.

In response to the march 29 incident, the NYPD has been sending cops into the New York subway armed with macine guns, as well as doing rounds with bomb sniffing dogs and random bag checks.
Evidently, in NWO logic, the equation goes something like this:
subway attack in Russia= police state needed in America.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/rail_cops_umdUeMj91LgYvYe2LV3zTN

http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0330/riders-question-nypd-ridiculous-show-force/

Now, what remains to be seen whether anyone happened to be running any kind of drill on the 29th of March. It wouldn’t surprise me if they were. Nothing surprises me anymore.

Ban The Niqab

This has been going on for a while, the push to ban the Niqab. I’m no muslim but this one bugs me in a big way and I’ll tell you why.
If you read the papers around here, you will see that the debate appears to center around whether the niqab makes people uncomfortable and whether it is fair for veiled muslim women to receive government services without having to uncover their face. While you are busy raising your bloodpressure over the question of whether foreigners should have to sacrifice a certain amount of religious freedom when they move to Canada, you are missing the true reason for why the niqab has been made into an issue at all: it interferes with the implementation of facial recognition software in surveillance systems.

In Quebec, the debate centers around the hapless pharmacist Naema Ahmed, who was twice thrown out of a government- mandated French class for refusing to remove her veil. The second time she was given the boot, it was in the middle of an exam, adding academic injury to cultural insult.
The public immediately split up into camps on the issue of religious freedom versus cultural intergation, spouting phrases like “If you want to come to Canada, you have to abide by Canadian law”, although no law exists against wearing a veil, and “The veil makes people uncomfortable: we want to see your face”.

Baaa, baa, baaa.

You don’t appreciate a veiled pharmacist? Is it for security reasons? Maybe you think she will send an impostor and poison her clients. Or perhaps, you just don’t like to be served by someone whose face is hidden. Allow me to just point out that when you go to the pharmacy, you give your order to a technician and pick it up from a cashier. The pharmacist often does nothing more than verify the prescription. She does give consultation, but if you are willing to take consultation over the phone from Info-Sante, not being able to see her face should be a non-issue. And if it still bothers you, you could always go across the street to another pharmacy.

Or is the issue just one of making people feel uncomfortable in general? Many things make people feel uncomfortable: public nose-picking and farting top the list. Maybe public rudeness should be outlawed, too. Unusual dress of all kinds makes some people squirm. Will that kid with the green mohawk be forced to remove his plethora of piercings before entering the classroom? How about transexual men in cheap wigs? And the guys who wear their pants so low you can see their crack? And while we’re on the subject of pants, how about the girls with the low-rise jeans who flaunt their neon-green thongs for all to see? Maybe what Quebec needs is a Minister of Modesty who will oversee the new dress code. Modest, but not too modest. Something that will ensure that no-one is ever offended by another’s attire. Maybe a uniform. It worked so well for communist China, after all.

Oh, but I digress. I was going to tell you why this has nothing to do with culture or religious freedom and everything to do with implementing a police state through the installation of cameras with facial recognition software.

You may remember that a little while back, the debate over facial coverings in Quebec had nothing to do with niqabs and everything to do with protesters. Unmask the trouble-makers! It’s for public safety!

I would like to point out that if anyone is doing anything illegal at a protest, the omnipresent riot police should be able to arrest them on the spot. So what is the problem with facial coverings? Oh, it prevents suspects who got away from later being identified and apprehended. This, of course, would not be possible either unless there were cameras in place to capture their naked mugs for later analysis.

If you want to see where we are heading in terms of surveillance, all you have to do is look at England, where they now have not only thousands of cameras eyeing your every move, but even programs by which citizens can serve their country by spying on their fellow- Londoners and promptly correcting their behaviour by addressing them through loudspeakers. “Madam, you have dropped your cigarette butt: please pick it up”.

We are surrounded with propaganda when it comes to the niqab debate, but it is not about manipulating you to suddenly feel there is a pressing need to force people to accommodate to ‘Canadian culture’- whatever that is. It’s about making you think that is the issue in the first place.

The War Against Islam

Islam is the fastest growing religion with about 20 000 converts each year in America alone. It is the most practiced religion today with 1.5 billion followers all over the world and is about is about submitting yourself to God. Doesn’t that sound like a beautiful thing? Unfortunately there are people behaving quite aggressively toward these peace loving people.

The Israeli police have been restricting access to Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem since Monday. Al-Aqsa is regarded by Islam as the third holiest site. Located on the Temple Mount, it is regarded as the holiest site by the Jews because it is where the Second Temple stood. Is it possible that this is where the third temple is to be built? Or will the Mosque be re-opened for service and tourism? Busloads of Muslims will be arriving in East Jerusalem in the coming days.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100315/wl_afp/mideastconflictjerusalem
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3863006,00.html

Further North, Geert Wilders is a Dutch politican and maker of the movie “Fitna”, a 15 minute film depicting the Qu’ran as associated with terrorism, homophobia, the repression of women with a title which transliterates to a strife or conflict within a group. This man is calling for a ban of the Qu’ran in the Netherlands because he perceives the book to be more dangerous than Mein Kampt. If elected he says he would close all Islamic schools, ban construction of new mosques, and expel Dutch Muslim criminals if they held dual citizenship.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/05/ap/world/main6269136.shtml

Ban the Koran? Geert Wilders speaks out on his radical views on RT

Joe Stack- False Flag?

At about 10:00am EST on February 18, 2010, software engineer Joe Stack crashed his twin-engine Cherokee plane into the IRS building in Austin, Texas. Immediately, the debate started of whether he should be considered a martyr or a terrorist, and the media made claims that ‘extremist groups’ were hailing Stack as a hero. As much as I didn’t want to believe that the incident could be another false flag, I found that after looking at the circumstances, there were a lot of strange things about the case and it did start to look more and more like som ekind of an inside job. Personally, I am completely against the use of any kind of violence as a form of protest against government injustice or anything else, for that matter. Joe Stack supposedly committed suicide in this way because he had been wronged by the IRS and the diatribe he published on his website shortly before carrying out his actions was called a ‘suicide note’ and was used as evidence of his reasons for the attack. i don’t know what he really expected to accomplish, other than furthering the agenda of the NWO by giving the US government more excuses to further take away people’s freedom in the name of security.

Timeline of events:

http://www.statesman.com/news/local/timeline-of-morning-s-chaos-251871.html?printArticle=y

Stack updated his website at 9:12 am (10:12 EST)
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2010/0218102stack1.html

9:15 am Joe Stack’s house goes up in flames. Witness says “Its sounded like a small bomb went off”. Conflicting reports of whether wife and daughter drove up just when fire trucks arrived or were rescued from burning house
http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/02/18/house_fire_in_north_austin.html

Sheryl Stack spent previous night in hotel with daughter Margaux. Former bandmate of Stack says act was out of character:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/19/texas.plane.crash/index.html

Hazmat Teams in place before crash: Megan Riley on Austin News
http://www.infowars.com/eyewitness-hazmat-teams-in-place-before-plane-crash/

Explosives in Plane? ABC News
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=9885576

Windows exploded, “It felt like a bomb went off”, reminded victims of 9/11, “the plane hit with a “big whoomp” and then a second explosion”

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/767490–tax-rage-spurs-texas-crash?bn=1

Witnesses: nearby buildings shook
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/02/18/texas.plane.crash/index.html

Plane may have been loaded with stolen drum of extra fuel
http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/19/texas.plane.crash/index.html

Stack’s daughter says letter doesn’t sound like it was written by him. Body of 2nd victim identified as Vernon Hunter:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100220/ap_on_re_us/us_plane_crash_texas

Alex Jones reports FBI had prior knowledge, were anticipating attack
http://www.infowars.com/source-fbi-knew-austin-attack-was-coming-2/

Joe Stack’s NSA and defense contractor-related clients
http://www.infowars.com/joe-stacks-911-nsa-and-homeland-security-related-defense-contractor-clients/

Strange parallels with the Sam Byck case:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Byck

Movie trailer of “The Plot To Kill Nixon” (2007) about Sam Byck
http://www.videodetective.com/movies/THE_PLOT_TO_KILL_NIXON/trailer/P00857215.htm